Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41004518›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Anti-cancer compound screening identifies Aurora Kinase A inhibition as a means to favor CRISPR/Cas9 gene correction over knock-out.

Danny Wilbie, Selma Eising, Vicky Amo-Addae, Johanna Walther, Esmeralda Bosman, Zhiyong Lei, Olivier G de Jong, Jan J Molenaar, Enrico Mastrobattista

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Danny WilbieDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1004-304X
Selma EisingPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Vicky Amo-AddaePrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Johanna WaltherDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Esmeralda BosmanDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Zhiyong LeiCDL Research, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Olivier G de JongDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Jan J MolenaarDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Enrico MastrobattistaDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR gene therapy holds the potential to cure a variety of genetic diseases by causing a targeted DNA break, which is repaired by host DNA damage responses. One option to introduce precise gene corrections is via the homology-directed repair (HDR) pathway. The problem in utilizing this pathway is that CRISPR-induced double stranded DNA breaks are more likely to be erroneously repaired by the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway, which may introduce random insertions or deletions at the cut site. We screened a small library of oncological drug compounds to steer the DNA repair process towards preferential HDR activation. We included forty compounds in the screen based on their mechanism of action. After optimizing the toxicity and adding these compounds during gene editing, nine showed a potential benefit for HDR activation. Three were shown to be beneficial after validation: rucaparib, belinostat and alisertib. The Aurora Kinase A inhibitor alisertib in particular led to an over 4-fold increase in preferential gene correction over gene knock-out in two cell models (HEK293T and Hepa 1-6) at sub-micromolar dosages on the eGFP locus, prompting further validation. On the long term this pathway did show cytotoxicity especially in the HEK293T cells, indicating further mechanistic investigation is needed, but this toxicity was less pronounced in primary hepatocytes.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsAurora Kinase ACRISPR-Cas SystemsProtein Kinase InhibitorsAzepinesCell Line, TumorDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorGene EditingGene Knockout TechniquesHEK293 CellsHumansPyrimidinesRecombinational DNA RepairAntineoplastic AgentsAurora Kinase AAzepinesMLN 8237Protein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidines

Identifiers

PMID41004518
PMCPMC12469161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.