ArticlePloS one2025
Anti-cancer compound screening identifies Aurora Kinase A inhibition as a means to favor CRISPR/Cas9 gene correction over knock-out.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Azide-functionalized SpCas9 enables generation of site-selective and bioactive Cas9-siRNA conjugates.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2026Article
- Protocol to rapidly screen CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing outcomes in a cell population by mutating eGFP to a blue or non-fluorescent phenotype.STAR protocols · 2025Article
- Aurora kinases signaling in cancer: from molecular perception to targeted therapies.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CRISPR gene therapy holds the potential to cure a variety of genetic diseases by causing a targeted DNA break, which is repaired by host DNA damage responses. One option to introduce precise gene corrections is via the homology-directed repair (HDR) pathway. The problem in utilizing this pathway is that CRISPR-induced double stranded DNA breaks are more likely to be erroneously repaired by the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway, which may introduce random insertions or deletions at the cut site. We screened a small library of oncological drug compounds to steer the DNA repair process towards preferential HDR activation. We included forty compounds in the screen based on their mechanism of action. After optimizing the toxicity and adding these compounds during gene editing, nine showed a potential benefit for HDR activation. Three were shown to be beneficial after validation: rucaparib, belinostat and alisertib. The Aurora Kinase A inhibitor alisertib in particular led to an over 4-fold increase in preferential gene correction over gene knock-out in two cell models (HEK293T and Hepa 1-6) at sub-micromolar dosages on the eGFP locus, prompting further validation. On the long term this pathway did show cytotoxicity especially in the HEK293T cells, indicating further mechanistic investigation is needed, but this toxicity was less pronounced in primary hepatocytes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.