ArticlePloS one2025
Season, wind speed, and seasonal rain are major drivers of a regional aeolian sediment transport model.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wind erosion and sediment transport continue to increase in many parts of the world, leading to decreased soil quality, accelerated snow-melt, respiratory diseases, and traffic accidents. The processes that control sediment transport are well understood at small scales of mm to m but are less well understood at larger scales of km to hundreds of km. Here we test four approaches aimed at improving the variance explained in sediment transport measured in a network of 52 horizontal sediment flux collecting devices located on the Colorado Plateau, USA. First, switching from a regression tree to random forest statistical analysis increased the variance in sediment transport explained from 58% to 91%. Soil moisture as a single variable explained 52% of variation in sediment flux, but had a negligible effect on a random forest model with season (Winter, Spring, Summer), wind speed, and seasonal total precipitation. Similarly, adding four years of new data to an existing five-year dataset or adding measurements of soil roughness and grazing failed to improve variance explained. By explaining 91% of the variance in sediment transport, our model provides baseline model for understanding sediment transport on the landscape scale. Dust flux networks in new regions would likely need to collect at least 300-500 samples to describe variation in sediment transport values using random forest analyses of the effects of season, wind speed, seasonal rain and vegetation type.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.