ArticleFolia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP)2025
A Phenomenological Study Exploring the Perceptions of Parents and Children Participating in the Lidcombe Program for Early Stuttering in Turkiye.
Article in Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Extended Clinical Follow-Up and Long-Term Stuttering Outcomes: A 24-Month Observational Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErratum.2026
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
<p>Introduction: The Lidcombe Program for early stuttering is one of the most evidence-based treatment methods practiced by speech and language therapists worldwide. Our phenomenological study was the first to explore the perceptions of Turkish parents and children based on their lived experiences of participating in the Lidcombe Program in Ankara, Turkiye.
methodsWe conducted semi-structured, in-depth interviews with eight Turkish parents and six of their children after the end of stage 1 of the Lidcombe Program. We interpreted the changes and challenges perceived by parents and children (excluding improvements in speech fluency) using reflexive thematic analysis grounded in the constructionist paradigm.
resultsFour primary themes and their constituent subthemes provided sufficient empirical evidence to provide answers to four research questions. (1) "Changes perceived by parents after the Lidcombe Program" included the loss of doubtful or negative feelings about their children's stuttering, improved duration of playing games with their children, increased frequency of praise they gave to their children, and better communication with their children and other family members. (2) "Challenges perceived by parents in the Lidcombe Program" included their other children's inability to participate in therapy or home practices. (3) The positive effects of the Lidcombe Program on children included increased socialization, self-confidence, school success, and overall happiness. (4) "Children's perceptions of the Lidcombe Program" included liking the program, coming to the therapy sessions with their parents, playing games with and receiving praise from their parents; however, the children disliked parental requests for self-correction. The perceptions of the Turkish participants are compared to the more variable perceptions of Lidcombe Program participants in other countries.
conclusionThe Lidcombe Program was generally perceived positively by Turkish parents and children, with benefits extending beyond fluency to emotional well-being, family interaction, and children's confidence. Challenges such as sibling involvement and children's resistance to self-correction highlight the need for culturally and contextually sensitive adaptations. These findings underscore the importance of including both parental and child perspectives when evaluating early stuttering interventions. </p>.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.