ArticleJAMA health forum2025
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Occupational Health.
Article in JAMA health forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Occupational health disparities affect the safety and well-being of workers across different racial and ethnic groups. Understanding these disparities is crucial for developing targeted interventions, but evidence on occupational injury rates by race and ethnicity has been scarce due to data limitations. Objective: To determine the incidence of lost-time workplace injuries among major racial and ethnic groups in California and to assess the contributions of occupational concentration and within-occupation disparities to these differences. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional study analyzing 15 years (2005-2019) of California workers' compensation data was carried out. The study examined injury rates across 4 racial and ethnic groups: Asian/Pacific Islander (non-Hispanic), Black (non-Hispanic), Hispanic, and White (non-Hispanic). California residents employed in the private sector or state and local government, encompassing diverse industries and occupations, between 2005 and 2019 were included. Analysis was conducted between May 2024 and May 2025. Intervention: The study analyzed existing workers' compensation data without specific interventions. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the incidence of lost-time workplace injuries, with comparisons made between racial and ethnic groups. The analysis focused on the role of occupational concentration and within-occupation disparities in explaining injury rates. Results: The analysis included 2.6 million lost-time injuries among California workers (mean [SD] age, 42 [11]; 63% male). The overall injury rate was 1.32 lost-time injuries per 100 full-time equivalent workers (FTE). Lost-time injury rates were higher for Black (1.74 cases per 100 FTE) and Hispanic workers (1.90 cases per 100 FTE) than for White workers (1.00 cases per 100 FTE), whereas rates were lower for Asian/Pacific Islander workers (0.63 cases per 100 FTE). Black and Hispanic workers experienced injury rates that were 74% and 90% higher, respectively, compared with White workers, whereas Asian/Pacific Islander workers had injury rates that were 37% lower. Occupational concentration accounted for 53% of the disparity between Black and White workers and 71% of the disparity between Hispanic and White workers. Notably, 56% of the excess risk of injuries for Black women was attributed to within-occupation disparities. Conclusions and Relevance: Disparities in workplace safety are a significant contributor to racial and ethnic health disparities. Addressing both occupational concentration and within-occupation disparities is essential for improving workplace safety and reducing health inequities among workers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.