Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41004159›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2025

Cortical networks involved in judging the attention of others.

Kirsten Ziman, Sarah C Kimmel, Isaac Christian, Kathryn T Farrell, Michael S A Graziano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kirsten ZimanPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, 40 Woodlands Way, Princeton, NJ 08540, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8942-3362
Sarah C KimmelDepartment of Psychology, Princeton University, South Drive, Princeton, NJ 08540, United States.
Isaac ChristianDepartment of Psychology, Princeton University, South Drive, Princeton, NJ 08540, United States.
Kathryn T FarrellPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, 40 Woodlands Way, Princeton, NJ 08540, United States.
Michael S A GrazianoPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, 40 Woodlands Way, Princeton, NJ 08540, United States.

Funding

NRSA Training Grant in Quantitative NeuroscienceT32MH065214 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI Nathaniel Douglass Daw, KENNETH A NORMAN · 2002 to 2026
$7.9M
AE Studios 24400B1459FA010NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH065214NIMH NIH HHS T32MH065214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding someone else's attention lies at the heart of human interaction. When we perceive something to be in someone else's attention, we understand it to be in that person's mind in the moment, ready to affect that person's choices. It has been proposed that people construct predictive models of the attentional state of others. In that proposal, a working understanding of someone else's attention goes far beyond merely tracking the direction of someone's eyes. For example, in a recent study, participants watched a spotlight of attention moving around a picture and successfully judged whether the trace represented real, human attention or an artificially manipulated version, demonstrating implicit information about how patterns of attention behave over space and time. However, the neuronal underpinnings of attention modeling are almost entirely unstudied. Here we tested people in an fMRI scanner while they performed the attention judgment paradigm. When contrasting attention traces that participants judged to be artificial versus those judged to be real, activity was found bilaterally in the precuneus, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate, and anterior insula, as well as in a part of the right temporoparietal junction. These areas partially overlap the theory-of-mind network and the salience network. The activations differ from those known to be involved in processing low-level features of attention such as the sight of other people's eyes. The results provide an initial picture of the cortical networks involved in monitoring the attention patterns of others and recognizing when those patterns deviate from expectation.

Indexed as

AttentionCerebral CortexJudgmentNerve NetAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeural PathwaysPhotic StimulationYoung Adultanterior cingulate cortexanterior insulaattentiondorsomedial prefrontal cortexprecuneuspredictive modelstemporoparietal junction

Identifiers

PMID41004159
PMCPMC12466331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.