ArticleGeneral thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2026
Effect of posterior pericardiotomy on atrial fibrillation in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery.
Article in General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePosterior pericardiotomy can be performed after cardiac surgery to drain pericardial fluid and reduce the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation. However, the effect of posterior pericardiotomy in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery on the development of postoperative atrial fibrillation remains unknown.
methodsThe patients included in our study underwent complete revascularization through left anterior thoracotomy under cardiopulmonary bypass, using X-clamp and cardioplegia, without any limitations on coronary lesion type or localization. Patients who underwent minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass were retrospectively divided into two groups: the control group, consisting of patients who did not undergo posterior pericardiotomy, and the posterior pericardiotomy group, consisting of patients who underwent posterior pericardiotomy after this date. The two groups were retrospectively compared in terms of postoperative atrial fibrillation development, the day of left thoracic drain removal, and clinical characteristics.
resultsLower development of atrial fibrillation was observed in the posterior pericardiotomy group (n = 10, 13.3%) compared to the control group (n = 20, 30.3%) (p = 0.024). When comparing the days of drain removal, the left thoracic drain was removed later in the patients in the posterior pericardiotomy group compared to the control group (3.2 ± 1.18, 2.6 ± 0.96, p = 0.007). There was no difference between the groups in terms of patient characteristics compared (p > 0.05).
conclusionIn this revascularization technique, where the left-sided pericardiotomy is partially closed to prevent cardiac herniation, posterior pericardiotomy may help prevent the development of postoperative atrial fibrillation by facilitating the drainage of pericardial fluid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41004113What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.