ArticleDermatology and therapy2025
Physician-Reported Treatment Patterns in Moderate to Severe Chronic Hand Eczema: the RWEAL Multinational Medical Chart Review.
Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficacy and Safety of Delgocitinib and Its Impact on Patient's Perspective for Moderate-to-severe Chronic Hand Eczema in Adults: A 16-week Real-world Prospective Multicentre Study.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEvidence for moderate to severe chronic hand eczema (CHE) treatments in clinical practice is limited. The objective was to investigate treatment patterns in patients with moderate to severe CHE, and in those with an inadequate response to topical corticosteroids (TCS) or in whom TCS were contraindicated.
methodsThis was a multinational retrospective physician chart review. Physicians who routinely diagnosed and treated CHE were recruited in Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK and provided data on adult patients with moderate to severe CHE treated with TCS over the past 12 months or for whom TCS were contraindicated.
resultsA total of 292 physicians provided data on 1939 patients. Worst severity of CHE in the 12-month study period was judged by the physician to be moderate in 56.8% and severe in 43.2% of patients. Overall, 6.7% of patients received topical calcineurin inhibitors, 3.9% phototherapy, 6.8% alitretinoin, 11.1% traditional orals (acitretin, azathioprine, oral corticosteroids, cyclosporine, methotrexate), 8.0% biologics, and 1.7% oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. An inadequate response or contraindication to TCS was reported in 39.9% of patients (27.4% progressed to phototherapy/systemics; 12.1% with adverse events or an inadequate response to high/ultra-high potency TCS, and 0.4% contraindicated). Among these patients, the highest line of treatment during the 12-month period was biologics in 29.2%, alitretinoin in 22.3%, oral JAK inhibitors in 5.1%, traditional orals in 33.3%, and phototherapy in 9.6% of patients. There were no significant differences in phototherapy/systemic treatments between patients with moderate and severe disease in this subgroup.
conclusionsDespite being a first-line treatment, 40% of patients with CHE were inadequately treated with or contraindicated to TCS. Over one-quarter of patients progressed to phototherapy or systemic therapy. These results suggest a lack of effective and well-tolerated topical treatment options in CHE. Graphical Abstract available for this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.