ArticleClinical journal of gastroenterology2025
Remarkable response to durvalumab and tremelimumab in a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report.
Article in Clinical journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimPredictive biomarkers for the efficacy of tremelimumab, a cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitor, in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have not yet been identified.
methodsWe report a case of HCC in which switching from bevacizumab plus atezolizumab to tremelimumab plus durvalumab after disease progression resulted in marked tumor regression, accompanied by the development of immune-related adverse event hepatitis. To explore the underlying mechanism, we performed immunohistochemical analysis of CD80, CD86, CD31, and CD3 expression in HCC tissue samples from 15 patients, including the present case.
resultsImmunohistochemistry for PD-L1 showed no detectable expression in the tumor tissue. CD80 (a co-stimulatory molecule that binds to CD28 and CTLA-4) was strongly expressed in hepatoma cells, with higher levels compared to the other cases. In contrast, CD86 (another co-stimulatory molecule) was observed in non-parenchymal cells, with relatively low expressions in this case. Similarly, the expression levels of CD31 (microvessel density marker) and CD3 (T lymphocyte marker) were also low.
conclusionStrong expressions of CD80 may have contributed to the therapeutic response by shifting its binding from CTLA-4 to CD28 following CTLA-4 blockade, thereby promoting T cell activation. CD80 expression may serve as a predictive biomarker for the efficacy of CTLA-4 blockade therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41004067What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.