ReviewSub-cellular biochemistry2025
The Strange Case of the Noncanonical Lamina: Deep Divisions in Nuclear Organisation?
Review in Sub-cellular biochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The nuclear envelope is subtended in most eukaryotes by a proteinaceous lamina, a network that has been recognised since the 1950s. Originally considered as a simple structural support, it is now clear that the lamina can be highly dynamic and participates in a multitude of functions, including transcriptional and epigenetic regulation, definition of chromatin domains, genome stability and the positioning of nuclear pore complexes. The major protein components of the lamina in metazoans are ~60 kDa lamins, which assemble to form fibres and a network and are regulated by multiple mechanisms. Despite a broad taxonomic distribution beyond Metazoa, lamins are not universal and, in at least three major lineages, are absent, specifically fungi, plants and kinetoplastid protists. The latter two possess lineage-specific lamin analogues, the CRWN and NUP-1/NUP-2 proteins, respectively. Here we discuss and compare the kinetoplastid and plant lamina, their origins, components and functions and spectacular examples of convergent evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41004044What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.