ArticlePharmacoEconomics - open2026
Estimating the Value of Adding 30 Days to the 180-Day Market Exclusivity of the First-to-File Generic Drug Manufacturer.
Article in PharmacoEconomics - open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesAs an additional incentive to bringing more generic drugs to more markets sooner, our aim was to estimate the value of adding 30 days to the 180 days of market exclusivity currently granted to a qualifying first-to-file (FTF) generic drug entrant after its manufacturer successfully challenges a brand drug's patents.
methodsUsing IQVIA's monthly data on drug sales in the U.S. from January 2014 through June 2021, we identified 37 generic drug markets in which one or more generic companies successfully challenged the relevant brand drug patents and began commercial marketing within 75 days of receiving final approval of their Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA). We compared each generic drug's sales during the last month of its 180-day exclusive market access (Month 6) with its sales during the first month after their exclusivity expired (Month 7). Our calculation of this change in sales accounted for confounding factors such as the presence of an authorized generic in the market during the exclusivity period and the number of new generic entrants in Month 7. This calculated change represents the value to the FTF manufacturer of extending the 180-day market exclusivity to 210 days.
resultsOur analysis shows that an FTF generic experiences a 13.0% reduction in sales from Month 6 to Month 7, on average. Extending the 180-day exclusivity by 30 days could lower the magnitude of this reduction to 3.1%, resulting in a 9.8% gain in sales by the FTF generic. This gain represents about $870,000 in additional sales during Month 7, on average.
conclusionsThe value of an additional month of exclusivity to a generic firm is sizable and could entice more generic companies on the margin to take on the risk of patent challenges, especially in large markets.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.