ReviewSub-cellular biochemistry2025
Simulating Crowding In Vitro: Not an Elusive Goal Any Longer.
Review in Sub-cellular biochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A few decades ago, it became clear that most biophysical studies were performed on proteins under conditions not corresponding to those found in vivo, thus limiting the generality of at least some of the conclusions. The main difference was identified in the absence, in the dilute solutions typically used, of large amounts of other macromolecules. Solution conditions similar to those found in vivo were dubbed as crowded. The main consequences of crowding were identified as the influence of crowding on protein stability and on alterations of reaction conditions due to changes in protein activity. Initial experimental work to assess the effect of crowding on protein stability was dominated by theoretical estimations that suggested an increase of the unfolding temperatures between 5 and 20 °C. The present chapter examines some of the techniques typically used in these studies in a critical way, exploring the most common methodologies employed to study proteins under crowded conditions. One of the critical problems is the choice of the crowders. There are two categories of commonly used macromolecular crowders, synthetic polymers and common proteins. Synthetic crowders often do not interfere with optical measurements of proteins. When proteins are used as crowder it is necessary to label the protein under study. We demonstrate that studies of protein stability in crowded solutions provide more valuable information when observing the behaviour of marginally stable proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41004012What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.