ReviewSub-cellular biochemistry2025
Crowding in Anhydrobiosis.
Review in Sub-cellular biochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anhydrobiosis, the exceptional adaptation of some organisms to enter a state approaching suspended animation after losing most cellular water, has fascinated scientists and non-scientists since Anthony van Leeuwenhoek described the phenomenon over 300 years ago. Despite progress in elucidating molecular principles enabling 'life at a standstill,' we still lack a comprehensive understanding of the minimum biochemical requirements for desiccation tolerance. Biochemical strategies employed by anhydrobiotic organisms are multifaceted but commonly include the accumulation of intrinsically disordered proteins and compatible osmolytes, investment into antioxidant defense mechanisms, and, more recently recognized, the formation of biomolecular condensates. This chapter explores why water is the solvent capable of sustaining life on Earth and how it promotes biomolecular condensates in cells. We propose four mechanisms by which these biomolecular condensates may facilitate desiccation tolerance: 1.) The selective sequestration hypothesis proposes the formation of 'protective' biomolecular condensates, 2.) The selective target neutralization hypothesis suggests that biomolecular condensates may downregulate metabolic, developmental, and apoptotic pathways during water stress, 3.) The increased viscocapillary effect hypothesis proposes that the preservation of cellular morphology can be maintained during desiccation by a combination of increased viscosity and capillary forces exerted by biomolecular condensates, and 4.) The solvent property hypothesis postulates that water's physicochemical properties inside biomolecular condensates could be modulated to inhibit damage during desiccation. Integrating the known biochemical strategies observed in anhydrobiotes into a comprehensive model of desiccation tolerance may allow us to engineer this trait into water-stress sensitive systems to address societal challenges ranging from crop loss during droughts to stabilization of biomedical relevant cells at room temperature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41004009What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.