Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41004005›Full record

ReviewSub-cellular biochemistry2025

Catalytic Droplets: Enzyme Containing Microcompartments.

Munishwar Nath Gupta, Vladimir N Uversky

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Sub-cellular biochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Munishwar Nath GuptaDepartment of Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi, India.
Vladimir N UverskyDepartment of Molecular Medicine and USF Health Byrd Alzheimer's Research Institute, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA. vuversky@usf.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial microcompartments (BMCs) and biomolecular condensates are two different forms of protein compartmentalization with different aims and functional advantages, representing specific designs of sequestering enzymes or segments of metabolic pathways. BMCs represent special proteinaceous organelles that are entirely composed of protein and are typically characterized by polyhedral shapes. By encapsulating and organizing metabolic enzymes with their substrates and cofactors BMCs act as specialized compartments within bacterial cells that promote and enhance specific biochemical pathways. They also serve important protective functions shielding vulnerable enzymes within a defined microenvironment and sequestering toxic or volatile intermediates. On the other hand, biomolecular condensates (also known as membrane-less organelles, MLOs) are dynamic, cell size-dependent, cytoplasmic and nucleoplasmic entities that typically contain both RNA and protein. They have unique morphologies, specific distribution patterns, are characterized by specific set of resident proteins, but their structural integrity is not supported by encapsulation in the membrane. Instead, their biogenesis is driven by liquid-liquid phase separation, and their structure is entirely controlled and mediated by the protein-protein, protein-RNA, and/or protein-DNA interactions. MLOs represent a different liquid state of cytoplasm or nucleoplasm (or mitochondrial matrix or chloroplastic stroma), whose major biophysical properties are rather similar to those of the rest of the intracellular fluid. Often, MLOs emerge in response to some specific environmental cues, being exploited by cells to respond in real time in a smart stimuli-responsive manner. BMCs are more permanent entities with selective transport through the protein shell. In that way and in many respects, they are closer to intracellular membrane-bounded organelles of eukaryotes than to MLOs. This chapter discusses diverse functions of BMCs and considers the ways by which they contribute to metabolic innovation in bacteria. Some functional roles of MLOs are considered as well.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacterial ProteinsBiomolecular CondensatesEnzymesOrganellesCell CompartmentationCytoplasmBacterial ProteinsEnzymesBacterial microcompartmentsBiomolecular condensatesCarbon dioxide fixationCarboxysomesCompartmentalizationEndosymbiotic hypothesisInclusion bodiesMembrane-less organellesMulti-protein complexesOrganelleRuBisCO

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.