ReviewSub-cellular biochemistry2025
The Role of Macromolecular Crowding in Cytoskeletal Organization.
Review in Sub-cellular biochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The cytoskeleton is not only responsible for cell morphology and rheology, but is also involved in such functions as cell motility, intracellular transport and cell division. Key to all these roles is the suitable deployment of its labile parts, a process that occurs in a highly crowded environment. Here we consider the effects of crowding on the assembly and organization of cytoskeletal filaments, and how the cell exploits or evades these effects, as needed. Due to entropic trade-offs among different degrees of freedom, long protein filaments crowded by globular proteins spontaneously form segregated bundles. This behavior can be recruited to specific locations by proteins that nucleate filaments and can be adjusted by proteins that cross-link parallel filaments in a fashion that stabilizes polarity, spacing and register within the bundle. Alternatively, spontaneous bundling can be prevented by limiting filament growth with capping and severing proteins or by frustrating filament alignment with oblique cross-links or the formation of branches. Thus, building upon the effects of macromolecular crowding, a modest library of regulatory proteins is able to achieve versatile results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41004001What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.