ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
FairDITA: Disentangled Image-Text Alignment for Fair Skin Cancer Diagnosis.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advances in deep learning have significantly improved skin cancer classification, yet concerns regarding algorithmic fairness persist because of performance disparities across skin tone groups. Existing methods often attempt to mitigate bias by suppressing sensitive attributes within images. However, they are fundamentally limited by the entanglement of lesion characteristics and skin tone in visual inputs. To address this challenge, we propose a novel contrastive learning framework that leverages explicitly constructed image-text pairs to disentangle lesion condition features from skin tone attributes. Our architecture consists of a shared text encoder and two specialized image encoders that independently align image features with the corresponding textual descriptions of lesion characteristics and skin tone. Furthermore, we measure the semantic distance between lesion conditions and skin color embeddings in both image- and text-embedding spaces and perform optimal representation alignment by matching the distances in the image space to those in the text space. We validated our method using two benchmark datasets, PAD-UFES-20 and Fitzpatrick17k, which span a wide range of skin tones. The experimental results demonstrate that our approach consistently improves both classification accuracy and fairness across multiple evaluation metrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.