Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41003966›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

FairDITA: Disentangled Image-Text Alignment for Fair Skin Cancer Diagnosis.

Jiwon Park, Seunggyu Lee, Younghoon Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jiwon ParkDepartment of Data Science, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, 232, Gongneung-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul, 01811, Korea.
Seunggyu LeeGen AI R&D Team, INTERX, Ludwig-Erhard-Str.30-34, 65760, Eschborn, Germany.
Younghoon LeeDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, 232, Gongneung-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul, 01811, Korea. yhoon.lee@seoultech.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4199-936X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in deep learning have significantly improved skin cancer classification, yet concerns regarding algorithmic fairness persist because of performance disparities across skin tone groups. Existing methods often attempt to mitigate bias by suppressing sensitive attributes within images. However, they are fundamentally limited by the entanglement of lesion characteristics and skin tone in visual inputs. To address this challenge, we propose a novel contrastive learning framework that leverages explicitly constructed image-text pairs to disentangle lesion condition features from skin tone attributes. Our architecture consists of a shared text encoder and two specialized image encoders that independently align image features with the corresponding textual descriptions of lesion characteristics and skin tone. Furthermore, we measure the semantic distance between lesion conditions and skin color embeddings in both image- and text-embedding spaces and perform optimal representation alignment by matching the distances in the image space to those in the text space. We validated our method using two benchmark datasets, PAD-UFES-20 and Fitzpatrick17k, which span a wide range of skin tones. The experimental results demonstrate that our approach consistently improves both classification accuracy and fairness across multiple evaluation metrics.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSkin NeoplasmsAlgorithmsHumansSkin PigmentationMachine learning fairnessMultimodal representation learningSkin cancer diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID41003966
PMCPMC13230438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.