Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41003965›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026

Impact of fatigue levels on EEG-based personal recognition.

Xinghan Shao, C Chang, Haixian Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xinghan ShaoKey Laboratory of Child Development and Learning Science of Ministry of Education, School of Biological Science & Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210096, Jiangsu, PR China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8220-9737
C ChangCollege of Electronic Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Hefei, 230031, Anhui, PR China.
Haixian WangKey Laboratory of Child Development and Learning Science of Ministry of Education, School of Biological Science & Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210096, Jiangsu, PR China. hxwang@seu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 62176054National Natural Science Foundation of China 92270113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The uniqueness of the electroencephalogram (EEG), a distinct biometric marker inherent to each individual, yields significant advantages for user authentication and identification in brain-computer interface (BCI) systems. However, EEG features can easily change according to the user's state, which may affect the performance of biometric recognition systems based on EEG. Notably, in EEG data collection for such systems, fatigue levels can fluctuate over time-a factor that has yet to be thoroughly investigated concerning its impact on individual recognition performance. This study explores the implications of fatigue on EEG-based personal recognition systems. We derived six sub-datasets from two simulated driving datasets, each labeled with varying levels of fatigue. From each sub-dataset, we extracted six features for identity recognition within and across different fatigue levels. Single-session and cross-session studies revealed that the disparity of EEG fatigue levels between the training and testing sets increased, and system recognition accuracy experienced a decline. Specifically, recognition accuracy typically fell by over 30

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesElectroencephalographyFatigueAdultAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedBCIBiometricsEEGFatiguePerformance evaluationPersonal identification

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.