Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41003920›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI research2025

Marc C Huisman, Johanna E E Pouw, Sandeep S V Golla, Damien Huglo, Franck Morschhauser, Josée M Zijlstra, Jessica E Wijngaarden, Mirte Stavenga, Hylke J Sebus, Maarten Slebe and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Pharmaceutics · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Marc C HuismanDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.huisman@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-1690-2496
Johanna E E PouwCancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sandeep S V GollaDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Damien HugloDepartment of Hematology, EA7365-GRITA-Groupe de Recherche sur les forms Injectables et les Technologies Associées, Université de Lille, CHU Lille, Lille, France.
Franck MorschhauserDepartment of Hematology, EA7365-GRITA-Groupe de Recherche sur les forms Injectables et les Technologies Associées, Université de Lille, CHU Lille, Lille, France.
Josée M ZijlstraCancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jessica E WijngaardenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mirte StavengaCancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hylke J SebusCancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maarten SlebeCancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Andrea ThieleDepartment of Translational Medicine & Clinical Pharmacology, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach an der Riss, Germany.
Danielle VugtsDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Iris H C MiedemaCancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gerben J C ZwezerijnenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Idris BahceCancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
C Willemien Menke-van der Houven van OordtCancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dhaval K ShahDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, The State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, USA.
Yvonne W S JauwCancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ronald BoellaardDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTypically, tissue uptake, expressed in tissue over plasma ratio (TPR), is reported from a 89Zr-mAb PET study. Nonspecific antibody catabolism and the residualizing property of 89Zr hamper the use of tissue uptake as a measure for target mediated uptake. Therefore, we propose to report uptake as tissue over plasma ratio additionally corrected for nonspecific antibody catabolism (cTPR). We introduce an organ specific but time independent baseline tissue over plasma ratio (bTPR), which is the expected tissue over plasma ratio in the absence of target mediated uptake. Target mediated uptake is then evident from a cTPR value higher than bTPR. We analyzed retrospectively tissue uptake reported for three 89Zr-mAb studies. The method of correction for non-specific uptake due to antibody catabolism requires the net rate of irreversible 89Zr uptake due to nonspecific antibody catabolism, total tissue exposure to 89Zr-mAb (the area under the plasma time concentration curve, obtained from blood sampling) and a single PET scan taken more than 24 h post injection.

resultsFor 89Zr-Cetuximab, 38% of spleen uptake at 144 h post injection is due to nonspecific antibody catabolism (median, n = 7). Furthermore, it ranges between 27 and 63% due to interindividual variability in tissue exposure. Patients are ranked differently for total compared to corrected 89Zr-mAb uptake, leading to the risk of invalid conclusions from PET studies if based on total uptake.

conclusion89Zr-mAb PET uptake should be reported as tissue over plasma ratio corrected for nonspecific antibody catabolism.

Indexed as

89Zr-immuno-PET89Zr-mAbQuantification

Identifiers

PMID41003920
PMCPMC12474831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.