ArticleEJNMMI research2025
Article in EJNMMI research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Spatial PK-PD mismatch in tumor-targeting antibodies and ADCs: from lesion access to pharmacologic execution.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTypically, tissue uptake, expressed in tissue over plasma ratio (TPR), is reported from a 89Zr-mAb PET study. Nonspecific antibody catabolism and the residualizing property of 89Zr hamper the use of tissue uptake as a measure for target mediated uptake. Therefore, we propose to report uptake as tissue over plasma ratio additionally corrected for nonspecific antibody catabolism (cTPR). We introduce an organ specific but time independent baseline tissue over plasma ratio (bTPR), which is the expected tissue over plasma ratio in the absence of target mediated uptake. Target mediated uptake is then evident from a cTPR value higher than bTPR. We analyzed retrospectively tissue uptake reported for three 89Zr-mAb studies. The method of correction for non-specific uptake due to antibody catabolism requires the net rate of irreversible 89Zr uptake due to nonspecific antibody catabolism, total tissue exposure to 89Zr-mAb (the area under the plasma time concentration curve, obtained from blood sampling) and a single PET scan taken more than 24 h post injection.
resultsFor 89Zr-Cetuximab, 38% of spleen uptake at 144 h post injection is due to nonspecific antibody catabolism (median, n = 7). Furthermore, it ranges between 27 and 63% due to interindividual variability in tissue exposure. Patients are ranked differently for total compared to corrected 89Zr-mAb uptake, leading to the risk of invalid conclusions from PET studies if based on total uptake.
conclusion89Zr-mAb PET uptake should be reported as tissue over plasma ratio corrected for nonspecific antibody catabolism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.