ArticleTropical animal health and production2025
Ruderal Tithonia diversifolia inclusion in sheep diets: impacts on digestibility and greenhouse gas emissions.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Emissions from ruminant livestock represent an important component of agricultural greenhouse gas output. The sector, however, has substantial potential for emission reduction through improved practices. Tithonia diversifolia (TD), a shrub that thrives in low-fertility soils, offers promise as a sustainable feed alternative. This study explores whether ruderal TD, accessible but with variable nutritional quality, can be used to reduce enteric methane (CH4) emissions and nitrogen (N) excretion in sheep, offering a low-input strategy for enhancing ruminant sustainability. Eight adult rams were used to evaluate diets with 4 increasing levels of TD hay on carbon dioxide (CO2), CH4, nitrous oxide (N2O) and ammonia (NH3) emissions, apparent digestibility, and fermentation parameters. The animals received four increasing levels of TD hay (0, 90, 270, 450 g kg− 1 DM) in a diet based on Tifton 85 hay, soybean meal, and ground corn. Feeding sheep with ruderal TD had no effects on intake and N balance but reduced digestibility of dry matter, organic matter, neutral and acid detergent fiber, while crude protein digestibility remained unaffected. There was also a decrease in acetate and ruminal N-NH3 concentrations, alongside an increase in iso-acid proportions. CO2, CH4, N2O and NH3 emissions were consistent across diets, averaging 98.05 gCO2 kg− 1 DMI, 9.3 gCH4 kg− 1 DMI, 2.62 gN2O kg− 1 excreted N, and 37.8 gNH3 kg− 1 excreted N. In conclusion, incorporating ruderal TD into sheep diets reduced nutrient digestibility and ruminal fermentation but did not impact feed intake, protein digestibility, or greenhouse gas emissions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.