Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41003819›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2025

Milk-based supplementation in wet and dry feed forms: effects on growth performance, histomorphology, survivability, and economic outcomes in goslings.

Seda Iflazoglu Mutlu, Pinar Tatli Seven, Ulku Gulcihan Simsek, Zeki Erisir, Yasin Baykalir, Mehmet Hanifi Yalçın, Muhsin Mutlu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Seda Iflazoglu MutluDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Firat University, Elazig, 23119, Türkiye.
Pinar Tatli SevenDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Firat University, Elazig, 23119, Türkiye.
Ulku Gulcihan SimsekDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Firat University, Elazig, 23119, Türkiye.
Zeki ErisirDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Firat University, Elazig, 23119, Türkiye.
Yasin BaykalirDepartment of Biostatistics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Balikesir University, Balikesir, 10145, Türkiye.
Mehmet Hanifi YalçınDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Firat University, Elazig, 23119, Türkiye.
Muhsin MutluMinistry of Agriculture and Forestry, Elazig Veterinary Control Institute, Elazig, 23200, Türkiye. muhsin.mutlu@tarimorman.gov.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2097-7217

Funding

Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye TOVAG-120O943
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of supplementing starter diets for goslings with milk powder (MP), milk replacer (MR), and whey powder (WP) in two different forms (dry and wet) on growth performance, survivability, intestinal histomorphology, and economic evaluation. Early nutrition is critical in goslings, yet limited research has addressed how milk-based supplements influence gut development and economic outcomes in this species. Therefore, a total of 192 one-day-old goslings were randomly assigned to eight groups in a 2 × 4 factorial experimental design involving two feed forms (dry, wet) and four additive treatments (0%, MP-4%, MR-4%, and WP-4%). The experiment lasted 70 days. Feed form significantly affected the feed conversion ratio, with better efficiency in the dry group (P < 0.001), while body weight, body weight gain, and feed intake were not significantly influenced by either feed form or additive (P > 0.05). Villus length, villus width, and crypt depth were greater in the dry feed groups, whereas lamina muscularis thickness was higher in the wet groups (P < 0.001). Among the additives, the WP groups had the highest villus length and lamina muscularis thickness, and the MR groups showed the highest villus width and crypt depth values (P < 0.001). The most favorable economic outcome was observed in the Dry-WP group, which had the lowest carcass cost at 16.00 TL per kg, compared to TL18.63 TL in the highest-cost group (Wet-MR). Goslings in all supplemented groups (dry-MR, dry-WP, wet-MP, wet-MR, and wet-WP) exhibited a 100% survival rate throughout the trial, while slightly lower survival (95.83%) was recorded in the control groups (P > 0.05). In conclusion, although milk-based supplementation did not significantly affect overall performance, it enhanced gut morphology and survivability. These findings suggest that WP, especially in dry form, may facilitate gastrointestinal development, enhance nutrient absorption and improve economic efficiency during the critical first three weeks of the early growth phase in goslings.

Indexed as

Animal FeedDietary SupplementsMilkAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsDietRandom AllocationEconomic evaluationGeeseHistomorphologyPerformanceSurvivabilityWet-dry feed

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.