ArticleLasers in medical science2025
Evaluate the effects of photobiomodulation of blue led light combined with different graft materials on bone healing in the rat model.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to evaluate the effects of blue LED light therapy on bone healing in critical-size calvarial defects treated with different graft materials. Specifically, the photobiomodulatory effects of blue light were assessed in combination with cuttlebone graft and demineralized bone matrix (DBM), using clinical, radiological, and histopathological methods. Animals studied A total of 120 male Wistar Albino rats, aged 12 months, were included in the study. Procedures Rats were randomly assigned to five main groups, each subdivided into four time-point subgroups (days 7, 14, 21, and 28), with six animals per subgroup. Under general anesthesia, an 8-mm-diameter critical-size defect was surgically created in the calvarial region of each rat. The control group received no treatment. The other experimental groups included: DBM only, DBM + blue LED light, cuttlebone graft only, and cuttlebone graft + blue LED light. Blue LED therapy was applied at defined intervals, and animals were sacrificed at predetermined time points. Radiographic evaluations and histopathological analyses were conducted. Bone healing was scored histologically, and the results were statistically analyzed. Results No statistically significant differences in healing were observed between the DBM and cuttlebone-only groups at any time point (p > 0.05). Among the blue light-treated groups, the DBM + blue light group exhibited significantly enhanced bone regeneration on day 21 compared to the other groups (p < 0.05). However, by day 28, there were no significant differences between the two light-treated graft groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion The findings of this study indicate that blue LED light therapy, particularly when combined with demineralized bone matrix (DBM), can significantly enhance the healing of critical-size calvarial defects at specific time points.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41003806What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.