ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2025
Development and validation of machine-learning model based on dynamic tumor markers in predicting pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter cohort study.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mitochondrial fitness in circulating T cells predicts neoadjuvant therapy response in locally advanced colorectal cancer.Gastroenterology report · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and computational prediction models for risk stratification, treatment response, and outcomes in colorectal cancer: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn this study, we constructed a new pCR predictor based on dynamic tumor marker changes before and after NCRT, the dynamic tumor marker score (DTMS), and combined it with other clinicopathological features to build a machine-learning model.
methodsIn this retrospective study of patients with LARC between September 2010 and October 2017 at The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University (FJMUFAH), Fujian Medical University Union Hospital (FJMUUH), and Fujian Provincial Hospital (FJPH), the DTMS predictor was constructed using logistic regression. Factors associated with pCR were screened using single-factor and multifactorial logistic regression, and 10 machine-learning algorithms were used to construct a pCR prediction model. Additionally, various metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), decision curve analysis, and calibration curves, were obtained to validate the model performance and verified using an external validation set. Finally, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values were used to interpret the predictive model. Moreover, we developed a website to facilitate the use of prediction modeling.
resultsAfter analyzing the data of 892 patients with LARC from FJMUFAH, DTMS, tumor size, N stage, and tumor distance from the anal verge were identified as independent predictive factors for pCR using univariate and multivariate regression analyses. The "extreme gradient boosting" (XGB) model displayed the best performance in the training set, with a mean AUC value of 0.86, an AUPRC value of 0.732, and SHAP values utilized in the analysis. In the two external validation sets, the model yielded AUC values of 0.80 and 0.82, along with corresponding AUPRC values of 0.519 and 0.593, respectively, which were the highest among all ten evaluated models, incorporating the use of SHAP values in the analysis. The model maintained superior predictive efficacy in the external validation cohorts (FJMUUH and FJPH).
conclusionsAs a novel marker based on dynamic changes in CEA and CA19-9 levels, DTMS effectively predicted pCR within the XGB model, providing clinicians with a practical tool for treatment decision-making regarding LARC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.