Observational studyEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
Distance learning on breastfeeding for residents in pediatrics.
Observational study in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breastfeeding is essential for maternal and neonatal health, yet its promotion and support are often insufficiently addressed in medical and pediatric residency curricula. This study evaluated the acceptance and perceived effectiveness of a distance learning course on breastfeeding (DLC-Bf) developed by the Italian Societies of Pediatrics and Neonatology. A cross-sectional, observational study was conducted between August and November 2024. All pediatric residents enrolled in Italian pediatric schools (n = 1281) were invited to participate in an 11.5-h asynchronous distance learning course. The course included pre-recorded lectures, reading materials, and clinical case discussions. A 33-question anonymous online questionnaire was administered to evaluate participants' perceptions of the course's quality, content, format, and usefulness. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis. Of the 1281 residents invited, 74.2% accessed the course and 40.4% completed at least 90% of it. Among those who completed the DLC-Bf, perceived clarity, clinical relevance, and usefulness were high, particularly for modules on the management of common breastfeeding issues; however, only 23% completed the full course and 13.2% of all invitees responded to the survey, limiting inference due to potential selection and nonresponse bias. Almost two out of three residents noted discrepancies between the course contents and current practices in training hospitals, mainly referred to the management of the most common breastfeeding problems. The DLC-Bf was well received, highlighting the need for structured breastfeeding education during pediatric training. It may require improvements in order to increase the participation rate of residents, although this might depend mainly on the specific priority given to breastfeeding. Future research should assess the course's impact on residents' knowledge, attitudes, and skills in breastfeeding support. What is Known: • Breastfeeding is fundamental for maternal and neonatal health, even if training in medical and pediatric residency programs is often inconsistent. • Pediatricians play a key role in supporting breastfeeding, but curricula lack standardized, evidence‑based breastfeeding education. What is New: • We developed an online distance learning course on breastfeeding for pediatric residents with high reported satisfaction but low full completion • Practice-content discrepancies were observed, indicating the need for more interactive, clinically focused modules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.