ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Assessment of AI-driven anatomical recognition in robotic gastrectomy: A multicenter retrospective analysis.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of artificial intelligence intervention on awareness of anatomical landmarks in laparoscopic gastrectomy: An exploratory study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- A proof-of-concept study of surgical-VLM for surgical support in robotic surgery: contextual benchmarking against ChatGPT-5.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-based anatomical recognition improves surgeon decision-making during robotic gastrectomy.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrecise recognition of anatomical structures such as the pancreas, transverse mesocolon, and right gastroepiploic vein (RGEV) is critical for the safety and effectiveness of infrapyloric lymph node dissection during robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG). Misrecognizing these structures can increase the risk of complications. However, even expert surgeons may encounter difficulties identifying these structures due to variations in patient anatomy and surgical technique. This study aims to validate the performance of an artificial intelligence (AI) model for automated anatomical recognition during RDG across multiple institutions and evaluate its clinical utility in supporting surgeons.
methodsSurgical videos from 90 patients who underwent RDG at multiple high-volume centers in Japan were analyzed. The AI model's accuracy was evaluated using Intersection over Union (IoU) for the pancreas, transverse mesocolon, and RGEV across four high-volume institutions. The clinical utility of the AI model was assessed by comparing the accuracy of surgeons in identifying anatomical landmarks during infrapyloric lymph node dissection between procedures performed with and without AI assistance.
resultsDuring this surgical procedure, the IoU of our AI model for the pancreas, transverse mesocolon, and RGEV were 0.624, 0.575, and 0.618, respectively. Furthermore, despite differences in accuracy across the four facilities, the AI model achieved consistent IoU values ranging from 0.5 to 0.7 across all institutions, demonstrating minimal variability. AI-assisted surgeons showed significantly higher accuracy in recognizing anatomical landmarks, particularly the transverse mesocolon's edge, compared with those without AI assistance (91.7% vs. 80.6%, p = 0.043). These findings highlight the model's ability to enhance the safety and precision of infrapyloric lymph node dissection.
conclusionThe AI model demonstrated strong external validity and improved surgeons' recognition of anatomical structures during RDG. Its integration into clinical practice can potentially reduce the rate of surgical complications and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41003776What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.