ArticleMetabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society2025
OMNImet®•GUT collection kit supports sample collection and ambient temperature preservation of faecal short chain fatty acids.
Article in Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionShort-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are microbial metabolites that play critical roles in health. As SCFAs are highly volatile molecules and ongoing bacterial metabolism in faecal samples collected can cause compositional shifts, quick SCFA preservation at the point of sample collection is of utmost importance for valid results.
objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the OMNImet®•GUT kit as an immediate preservation method that stabilises SCFAs at room temperature compared to a standardised laboratory sodium hydroxide method.
methodsFaecal samples from 12 participants were included. For each sample, 1 g faeces was aliquoted into 2.5 ml OMNImet®•GUT buffer and 1 g faeces was aliquoted into 2.5 ml sodium hydroxide (current laboratory method). SCFA profiles were quantified at zero, 24-, and 48-h using gas chromatography. SCFA profiles were compared across patients, preservation method, and time point.
resultsResults showed that most SCFA profiles were stable and comparable between methods. The sample donor explained the most variance and was the most significant factor associated with the SCFA profiles, independent of the collection kit or duration at room temperature (R
conclusionThese findings support OMNImet®•GUT as a practical alternative for SCFA preservation, particularly for multicentre studies where immediate sample collection can be logistically challenging, but it is important to use a consistent collection method within studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41003759What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.