ArticleJournal of neurology2025
Ofatumumab treatment in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a retrospective multicenter cohort study.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sequential efgartigimod and ofatumumab for stiff-person syndrome: a case report illustrating a pathophysiology-informed strategy and literature review.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Novel B-Cell targeting therapy with subcutaneous ofatumumab in AQP4-IgG-seronegative Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders: efficacy and personalized dosing.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOfatumumab is a fully human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that selectively and highly depletes B cells. However, limited data on ofatumumab treatment are available in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous ofatumumab in patients with NMOSD.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study of patients with NMOSD who received ofatumumab treatment at 15 tertiary hospitals in China. The primary outcome was the annualized relapse rate (ARR). The secondary outcomes included disability measures (Expanded Disability Status Scale score, EDSS; the Aminoff-Logue Disability Scale, ALS), changes in aquaporin-4 IgG (AQP4-IgG) titers, and safety profiles during ofatumumab treatment.
resultsA total of 112 patients (88% female, median age 44.0 years with interquartile range [IQR 29.5-57.5]) received ofatumumab treatment for a median of 1.7 years (IQR: 1.1-2.0). The median ARR decreased significantly from 2.0 (IQR 0.7-10.0) before ofatumumab to 0 (IQR 0.0-0.0; p < 0.001) after ofatumumab. Twenty-two patients (20%) experienced 25 relapses, with 20 (80%) occurring within the first year of initiating ofatumumab treatment and 19 (76%) classified as minor. The EDSS score from start to the last follow-up also improved significantly (median: pre-treatment 3.5, IQR 2.0-6.5, post-treatment: 2.0, IQR1.0-3.5, p < 0.001). Among 94 patients, 71 (76%) showed reduced AQP4-IgG titers at last follow-up. Injection-related reactions were reported in 13 (12%) of 112 patients. Twenty-four infections occurred in 20 patients (18%) during the ofatumumab treatment, with 92% (22/24) being grade 1 or 2 (CTCAE version 5.0). Only 2 patients (2%) experienced pneumonia requiring hospitalization and recovered after antibiotic treatment (grade 3). Hypogammaglobulinemia was recorded in 14% (13/95) of patients and was not associated with infection.
conclusionsSubcutaneous ofatumumab treatment significantly reduces the relapse risk, limits worsening of disability, and reduces AQP4-IgG titers in NMOSD. Moreover, the safety profiles were generally acceptable. Further research is necessary to explore the sustained clinical response of ofatumumab in NMOSD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41003732What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.