ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2025
Enhancing Structured Team Communication in Acute Care Settings with Ambient AI Scribes.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis perspective explores how ambient artificial intelligence (AI) scribes could support documentation and quality improvement (QI) of structured, team-based provider-to-provider communication in acute care settings.
backgroundIn acute care settings, team-based discussions such as multidisciplinary rounds and handoffs are essential to the delivery of safe care. These discussions rely on standardized frameworks (eg, IPASS, checklists) to ensure consistent information transfer and shared understanding. Despite their importance, these verbal discussions are often incompletely documented or left undocumented in the electronic health record, leading to gaps in clinical narrative, difficulty in QI evaluation, and lost opportunities for organizational learning. APPROACH: We outline how ambient AI scribes could enhance documentation of team-based communication in daily rounding and handoff discussions. We examine key sociotechnical challenges, including workflow integration, multiprovider consent, surveillance concerns, and vendor collaboration. We describe our experience with proof-of-concept demonstrations as an early feasibility signal.
resultsAmbient AI scribes are a promising tool for capturing structured team communication. Their use should be explored for its potential to improve documentation, support clinician well-being, and enable data-driven approaches to QI and communication fidelity assessments. Effective implementation requires workflow adaptations incorporating scribe output verification, transparent governance, and trust-building efforts to ensure clinician acceptance. DISCUSSION: Ambient AI scribes represent a novel frontier in documentation of structured team discussions in acute care settings, with the potential to strengthen communication reliability and systems learning of these vital conversations. Future research should evaluate their impact on patient safety, workforce well-being, and patient outcomes in acute care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.