Trial reportInflammatory bowel diseases2026
Long-Term Ozanimod Therapy in Patients With Moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis After Failure of 5-Aminosalicylic Acid.
Trial report in Inflammatory bowel diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial of Oral RPC1063 as Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Open-Label Extension Trial of Oral RPC1063 as Therapy for Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Acid-enhanced drinkable hydrogel co-delivering riboflavin-loaded nanozymes for orchestrated inflammation-immune modulation and redox homeostasis in colitis therapy.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe evaluated the efficacy and safety of ozanimod after 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) failure in advanced therapy (AT)-naive patients with moderate ulcerative colitis (UC) in True North and its open-label extension (OLE).
methodsTrue North was a randomized, 52-week, phase 3 trial with an optional OLE. Efficacy was assessed in True North and the OLE; safety was assessed through OLE week 190.
resultsOverall, 203 AT-naive True North patients had moderate UC (Mayo endoscopic subscore of 2 + modified Mayo score of 4-6 + rectal bleeding subscore ≥1). Of these, 139 were also immunomodulator-naive and not receiving corticosteroids (5-ASA-exposed only) at baseline. Patients with moderate UC receiving ozanimod vs placebo achieved greater efficacy rates for all week 10 and week 52 outcomes, regardless of prior immunomodulator/corticosteroid use (eg, week 10 clinical remission: AT-naive = 36.8% vs 10.6%; 5-ASA-exposed only = 37.9% vs 17.2%). Higher symptomatic response rates were achieved by week 2 with ozanimod in AT-naive patients with moderate UC vs the overall AT-naive population (50.5% vs 38.7%); similar trends were observed in patients exposed only to 5-ASA. Efficacy was maintained through OLE week 190 in patients who entered OLE as True North week 52 ozanimod clinical responders. Of those entering OLE as True North week 10 ozanimod clinical nonresponders, 69.0% of AT-naive patients and 68.4% of patients exposed only to 5-ASA achieved symptomatic response by week 5. No new safety signals emerged.
conclusionsOzanimod was safe, effective, and durable up to ∼5 years in AT-naive patients with moderate UC who failed conventional therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02435992, NCT02531126.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.