Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41003624›Full record

ArticleSports (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Breaking Barriers: Understanding the Impact of Intellectual Impairment on Inductive Reasoning in Basketball.

Javier Pinilla-Arbex, Javier Pérez-Tejero, Yves Vanlandewijck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sports (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Javier Pinilla-ArbexGrupo de Investigación en Ciencias de la Actividad Física y Deporte (GICAF), Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Comillas Pontifical University, 28108 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8979-6567
Javier Pérez-Tejero"Fundación Sanitas" Chair in Inclusive Sport Studies, Faculty of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences-INEF, Technical University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4009-0755
Yves VanlandewijckFaculty of Movement and Rehabilitation Science, KU Leuven, Tervuursevest 101, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2982-0849

Funding

SPANISH MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND COMPETITIVENESS DEP2012-33649
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Access to high-performance sports is crucial for the holistic development and well-being of athletes with intellectual impairment (II). However, ensuring fair and equitable participation requires effective eligibility systems. This study investigates how basketball-specific inductive reasoning impacts athletes with II. A total of 92 elite male players with II (average age 26.3 ± 7 years) and 128 control players without II participated. This study used a tailored test to assess the ability to quickly and accurately arrange 12 photo series depicting basketball sequences. Athletes with II were hypothesized to require more time and arrange the image sequences less accurately compared to their peers. The results indicated that athletes with II took significantly more time (41.2 s ± 20.2 s) and arranged the image sequences less accurately than senior players without II (19.2 s ± 5.9 s). A discriminant function analysis classified 84.1% of players accurately, confirming that athletes with II performed at a lower level in basketball-specific activities that require inductive reasoning. These findings contribute to the development of Phase 3 of the classification model for athletes with II, which consists of 4 phases. This helps establish the eligibility system boundaries in basketball for individuals with II, promoting equitable access for athletes to high-performance sports.

Indexed as

classificationdisabilityeligibilityhigh-performancepara-sport

Identifiers

PMID41003624
PMCPMC12473677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.