ReviewVision (Basel, Switzerland)2025
State-Dependent Brain Stimulation for Visual Neurorehabilitation: Principles and Applications.
Review in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) depend on stimulation parameters such as intensity, location, frequency, and duration. In clinical practice, these parameters are often adapted from studies carried out in healthy individuals. However, in this narrative review, we indicate that the impact of TMS is also highly state-dependent, meaning it is influenced by the excitability of the targeted brain region at the time of stimulation. This state-dependency complicates the translation of findings from healthy individuals to clinical populations, as neurological disorders often alter brain states, limiting the applicability of standard stimulation protocols. To address this challenge, stimulation parameters must be chosen within a framework that accounts for the interaction between external stimulation and the brain's internal state. Such an approach enhances the specificity of interventions, allowing for targeted modulation of neural populations by manipulating brain states prior to stimulation. State-dependent TMS has shown promise in conditions like cortical blindness and amblyopia, where tailored approaches based on the brain state associated with the condition have facilitated more precise and effective treatments. We advocate that integrating state-dependent knowledge tailored to the specifics of visual disorders alongside judicious selection of stimulation parameters holds the potential to establish a comprehensive paradigm for future investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.