Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41003490›Full record

ReviewVision (Basel, Switzerland)2025

State-Dependent Brain Stimulation for Visual Neurorehabilitation: Principles and Applications.

Kuzma Strelnikov, Juha Silvanto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kuzma StrelnikovCentre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, University of Macau, Macau SAR 999078, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6613-2300
Juha SilvantoCentre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, University of Macau, Macau SAR 999078, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) depend on stimulation parameters such as intensity, location, frequency, and duration. In clinical practice, these parameters are often adapted from studies carried out in healthy individuals. However, in this narrative review, we indicate that the impact of TMS is also highly state-dependent, meaning it is influenced by the excitability of the targeted brain region at the time of stimulation. This state-dependency complicates the translation of findings from healthy individuals to clinical populations, as neurological disorders often alter brain states, limiting the applicability of standard stimulation protocols. To address this challenge, stimulation parameters must be chosen within a framework that accounts for the interaction between external stimulation and the brain's internal state. Such an approach enhances the specificity of interventions, allowing for targeted modulation of neural populations by manipulating brain states prior to stimulation. State-dependent TMS has shown promise in conditions like cortical blindness and amblyopia, where tailored approaches based on the brain state associated with the condition have facilitated more precise and effective treatments. We advocate that integrating state-dependent knowledge tailored to the specifics of visual disorders alongside judicious selection of stimulation parameters holds the potential to establish a comprehensive paradigm for future investigations.

Indexed as

amblyopiacortical blindnessnoninvasive brain stimulationrehabilitationstate-dependenttranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)

Identifiers

PMID41003490
PMCPMC12474408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.