ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2025
Integrating Additive and Traditional Manufacturing for Multiscale Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds.
Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applications of Nanofabrication Technologies in the Preparation of Biomimetic Structures.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Three-Dimensional Printing and Personalized Bioceramic Scaffolds for Dental and Maxillofacial Applications: A Narrative Review.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Natural Polymers in Tissue Engineering and Regeneration: Material-Cell Mechanotransduction, Biofabrication Strategies, and Clinical Translation.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Data-driven multiscale design of composite biomaterials: Integrating experiments, imaging, and computational modeling for biomedical engineering.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Article
- Modulation of Osteoclast Differentiation using Statin-Loaded Carbonate Hydroxyapatite Nanoemulsion during Orthodontic Relapse in Rats.Contemporary clinical dentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) has emerged as a cutting-edge technology for fabricating biomimetic scaffolds with controllable architectures and compositional diversity, showing great promise in the fields of bone tissue engineering (BTE) and regenerative medicine. However, due to limitations in printing resolution and single-process capabilities, AM alone struggles to replicate the complex multiscale hierarchical structures inherent in native bone. Traditional fabrication techniques provide valuable complementary strategies to address these limitations. This review systematically summarizes recent advances in the construction of heterogeneous scaffolds from a multiscale design perspective, encompassing macro-, meso-, and microscale approaches. Emphasis is placed on the integration of major AM techniques-such as extrusion-based and light-based printing-with conventional methods including freeze-drying, gas foaming, and electrospinning. Particular attention is given to emerging in situ fabrication strategies, such as in situ foaming and mineralization, which enable spatially resolved and functionally graded architectures. Furthermore, this review explores pathways for constructing multiscale-integrated scaffolds and examines the current challenges and opportunities in clinical translation. Collectively, this work provides a comprehensive framework to guide the development of next-generation bone tissue scaffolds with enhanced biological performance and translational potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.