ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2025
Digitally Designed Bone Grafts for Alveolar Defects: A Scoping Review of CBCT-Based CAD/CAM Workflows.
Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence and Digital Workflow in Craniofacial Bone Tissue Engineering: From Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) to Personalized Bioceramic Implants.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- 3D Printed Patient-Specific Resorbable Bone Scaffolds for Alveolar Bone Regeneration.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2026Review
- AI-assisted preoperative surgical planning for dental implant.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This scoping review aimed to systematically map the literature on digital workflows for the design and fabrication of customized bone grafts in oral and maxillofacial surgery. The review focused on the integration of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), computer-aided design (CAD), and computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) techniques for the production of personalized bone blocks. A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Ovid MEDLINE identified 151 records published between 2015 and 2025; after duplicate removal, screening, and full-text assessment, 16 articles were included. Six additional seminal studies published before 2015 were considered through manual search to provide historical background. The included studies consisted of case reports, case series, prospective clinical investigations, and preclinical experiments. Customization strategies involved synthetic hydroxyapatite scaffolds, CAD/CAM-milled allogeneic blocks, xenogeneic blocks, and digitally guided autogenous grafts. Four studies provided direct clinical documentation of customized CAD/CAM bone blocks, while the others offered complementary evidence on digital design, scaffold adaptation, or preclinical validation. Outcomes included graft adaptation, volumetric stability, implant survival, and limited histological analyses. Despite promising short-term results, no study has yet described the complete clinical workflow from CBCT acquisition to milling and implantation of a biological autologous or xenogeneic block in humans. This review underscores both the feasibility and the limitations of current approaches, highlighting the absence of fully validated digital-to-biological protocols as the main gap to be addressed in future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.