Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41003359›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2025

A Hybrid Framework for Red Blood Cell Labeling Using Elliptical Fitting, Autoencoding, and Data Augmentation.

Bundasak Angmanee, Surasak Wanram, Amorn Thedsakhulwong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bundasak AngmaneeDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Science, Ubon Ratchathani University, Ubon Ratchathani 34190, Thailand.ORCID 0009-0009-7985-0393
Surasak WanramDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine and Public Health, Ubon Ratchathani University, Ubon Ratchathani 34190, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-1866-0723
Amorn ThedsakhulwongDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Science, Ubon Ratchathani University, Ubon Ratchathani 34190, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-2240-3877

Funding

Science Achievement Scholarship of Thailand (SAST) N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a local dataset of abnormal RBC morphology from confirmed cases of anemia and thalassemia in Thailand, providing a foundation for medical image analysis and future AI-assisted diagnostics. Blood smear samples from six hematological disorders were collected between April and May 2025, with twelve regions of interest segmented into approximately 34,000 single-cell images. To characterize cell variability, a convolutional autoencoder was applied to extract latent features, while ellipse fitting was used to quantify cell geometry. Expert hematologists validated representative clusters to ensure clinical accuracy, and data augmentation was employed to address class imbalance and expand rare morphological types. From the dataset, 14,089 high-quality single-cell images were used to classify RBC morphology into 36 clinically meaningful categories. Unlike existing datasets that rely on limited or curated samples, this dataset reflects population-specific characteristics and morphological diversity relevant to Southeast Asia. The results demonstrate the feasibility of establishing scalable and interpretable datasets that integrate computational methods with expert knowledge. The proposed dataset serves as a robust resource for advancing hematology research and contributes to bridging traditional diagnostics with AI-driven clinical support systems.

Indexed as

anemiaautoencoderdata augmentationellipse fittingred blood cell morphologythalassemiaunsupervised clustering

Identifiers

PMID41003359
PMCPMC12470543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.