ArticleJournal of imaging2025
AI-Generated Patient-Friendly MRI Fistula Summaries: A Pilot Randomised Study.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions of Large Language Models in Health Care Communication: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Enhancing Patient Understanding of Perianal Fistula MRI Findings Using ChatGPT: A Randomized, Single Centre Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perianal fistulising Crohn's disease (pfCD) affects 1 in 5 Crohn's patients and requires frequent MRI monitoring. Standard radiology reports are written for clinicians using technical language often inaccessible to patients, which can cause anxiety and hinder engagement. This study evaluates the feasibility and safety of AI-generated patient-friendly MRI fistula summaries to improve patient understanding and shared decision-making. MRI fistula reports spanning healed to complex disease were identified and used to generate AI patient-friendly summaries via ChatGPT-4. Six de-identified MRI reports and corresponding AI summaries were assessed by clinicians for hallucinations and readability (Flesch-Kincaid score). Sixteen patients with perianal fistulas were randomized to review either AI summaries or original reports and rated them on readability, comprehensibility, utility, quality, follow-up questions, and trustworthiness using Likert scales. Patients rated AI summaries significantly higher in readability (median 5 vs. 2,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.