Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41003346›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2025

Test-Time Augmentation for Cross-Domain Leukocyte Classification via OOD Filtering and Self-Ensembling.

Lorenzo Putzu, Andrea Loddo, Cecilia Di Ruberto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lorenzo PutzuDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Cagliari, 09123 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5361-8793
Andrea LoddoDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6571-3816
Cecilia Di RubertoDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4641-0307

Funding

GNCS E53C24001950001SERICS PE00000014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Domain shift poses a major challenge in many Machine Learning applications due to variations in data acquisition protocols, particularly in the medical field. Test-time augmentation (TTA) can solve the domain shift issue and improve robustness by aggregating predictions from multiple augmented versions of the same input. However, TTA may inadvertently generate unrealistic or Out-of-Distribution (OOD) samples that negatively affect prediction quality. In this work, we introduce a filtering procedure that removes from the TTA images all the OOD samples whose representations lie far from the training data distribution. Moreover, all the retained TTA images are weighted inversely to their distance from the training data. The final prediction is provided by a Self-Ensemble with Confidence, which is a lightweight ensemble strategy that fuses predictions from the original and retained TTA samples using a weighted soft voting scheme, without requiring multiple models or retraining. This method is model-agnostic and can be integrated with any deep learning architecture, making it broadly applicable across various domains. Experiments on cross-domain leukocyte classification benchmarks demonstrate that our method consistently improves over standard TTA and Baseline inference, particularly when strong domain shifts are present. Ablation studies and statistical tests confirm the effectiveness and significance of each component.

Indexed as

domain generalisationdomain shiftlate fusionleukocyte classificationself-ensembletest-time augmentationweighted voting

Identifiers

PMID41003346
PMCPMC12470409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.