ReviewJournal of imaging2025
Colorectal Polyp Segmentation Based on Deep Learning Methods: A Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- SCA-Net: A Scale- and Contrast-Aware Network for Subtle and Low-Contrast Polyp Segmentation.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Genetic and Epigenetic Mechanisms in Serrated Adenocarcinomas and Classical Colorectal Carcinomas: An In Silico Study.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Model Performance and Clinical Usefulness in Automated Rectal Segmentation in CT for Prostate and Cervical Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Research on Polyp Segmentation via Dynamic Multi-Scale Feature Fusion and Global-Local Semantic Enhancement.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is one of the three most common cancers worldwide. Early detection and assessment of polyps can significantly reduce the risk of developing colorectal cancer. Physicians can obtain information about polyp regions through polyp segmentation techniques, enabling the provision of targeted treatment plans. This study systematically reviews polyp segmentation methods. We investigated 146 papers published between 2018 and 2024 and conducted an in-depth analysis of the methodologies employed. Based on the selected literature, we systematically organized this review. First, we analyzed the development and evolution of the polyp segmentation field. Second, we provided a comprehensive overview of deep learning-based polyp image segmentation methods and the Mamba method, as well as video polyp segmentation methods categorized by network architecture, addressing the challenges faced in polyp segmentation. Subsequently, we evaluated the performance of 44 models, including segmentation performance metrics and real-time analysis capabilities. Additionally, we introduced commonly used datasets for polyp images and videos, along with metrics for assessing segmentation models. Finally, we discussed existing issues and potential future trends in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.