Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41003344›Full record

ReviewJournal of imaging2025

Colorectal Polyp Segmentation Based on Deep Learning Methods: A Systematic Review.

Xin Liu, Nor Ashidi Mat Isa, Chao Chen, Fajin Lv

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xin LiuSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Engineering Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang 14300, Malaysia.ORCID 0009-0003-8816-7728
Nor Ashidi Mat IsaSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Engineering Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang 14300, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-2675-4914
Chao ChenSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Engineering Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang 14300, Malaysia.
Fajin LvCollege of Biomedical Engineering, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3652-2524

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is one of the three most common cancers worldwide. Early detection and assessment of polyps can significantly reduce the risk of developing colorectal cancer. Physicians can obtain information about polyp regions through polyp segmentation techniques, enabling the provision of targeted treatment plans. This study systematically reviews polyp segmentation methods. We investigated 146 papers published between 2018 and 2024 and conducted an in-depth analysis of the methodologies employed. Based on the selected literature, we systematically organized this review. First, we analyzed the development and evolution of the polyp segmentation field. Second, we provided a comprehensive overview of deep learning-based polyp image segmentation methods and the Mamba method, as well as video polyp segmentation methods categorized by network architecture, addressing the challenges faced in polyp segmentation. Subsequently, we evaluated the performance of 44 models, including segmentation performance metrics and real-time analysis capabilities. Additionally, we introduced commonly used datasets for polyp images and videos, along with metrics for assessing segmentation models. Finally, we discussed existing issues and potential future trends in this area.

Indexed as

deep learningMambapolyp segmentation

Identifiers

PMID41003344
PMCPMC12470534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.