Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41003261›Full record

ArticleJournal of Intelligence2025

Rethinking Intelligence: Implications for Teachers and Students in Barbadian Schools.

Jason Marshall, Garry Hornby

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jason MarshallSchool of Education, Faculty of Humanities and Education, The University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campus, Bridgetown P.O. Box 64, Barbados.
Garry HornbyInstitute of Education, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0026-3647

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In most Western societies, intelligence testing has evolved beyond simple measures of language and numerical abilities. Although these measures are valuable in predicting academic achievement and career success, it is widely recognized that modern intelligence assessments offer a more comprehensive view of intellectual aptitude. Unfortunately, in Caribbean Small Island Developing States, like Barbados, despite ongoing efforts towards educational reform and an increasing body of research and related theories advocating for inclusive approaches to understanding and nurturing students' intellectual development, the education system remains heavily influenced by traditional conceptualizations of intelligence that present a somewhat narrow view of students' aptitudes. This perspective appears to consider students' performance on high-stakes examinations measuring numerical and language abilities as perhaps the most indicative markers of intelligence. Building on the work of renowned educational theorists such as Sternberg, Renzulli, and Gardner, and drawing from literature on traditional and contemporary measures of intelligence, this opinion paper examines the implications of deconstructing and redefining traditional views of intelligence within the Barbadian educational context. The value of conventional measures and the potential challenges and limitations associated with transitioning to contemporary intelligence assessments are acknowledged, and the pedagogical and assessment implications at primary and secondary school levels are discussed.

Indexed as

education reformhigh-stakes examinationsintelligence testingintelligence theory

Identifiers

PMID41003261
PMCPMC12470414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.