Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41003140›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2025

Anti-Amyloid Monoclonal Antibodies for Alzheimer's Disease: Evidence, ARIA Risk, and Precision Patient Selection.

Amer E Alkhalifa, Abdulrahman Al Mokhlf, Hande Ali, Nour F Al-Ghraiybah, Vasiliki Syropoulou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Operationalizing Alzheimer's disease trials in the era of targeted therapies.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amer E AlkhalifaDepartment of Drug Discovery and Development, Harrison School of Pharmacy, Pharmacy Research Building, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6872-4780
Abdulrahman Al MokhlfFaculty of Medicine, University of Science and Technology, Sana'a 15034, Yemen.
Hande AliFaculty of Pharmacy, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, Zonguldak 67100, Türkiye.
Nour F Al-GhraiybahDepartment of Drug Discovery and Development, Harrison School of Pharmacy, Pharmacy Research Building, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-7278-9134
Vasiliki SyropoulouDepartment of Drug Discovery and Development, Harrison School of Pharmacy, Pharmacy Research Building, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia, pathologically defined by extracellular amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques and intracellular tau neurofibrillary tangles. Recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) aducanumab, lecanemab, and donanemab represent the first disease-modifying therapies for early AD. These therapies have generated both optimism and controversy due to modest efficacy and safety concerns, particularly amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIAs). This review synthesizes current evidence on the efficacy, safety, and biomarker-guided use of anti-Aβ mAbs in AD.

Indexed as

aducanumabAlzheimer’s diseaseamyloid-related imaging abnormalitiesamyloid-βAPOE ε4biomarkersdonanemablecanemabmonoclonal antibodiesprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID41003140
PMCPMC12470750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.