ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Block Magnets with Uniform Core-Shell Microstructure Regenerated from NdFeB Grain Boundary Diffusion Sheet Magnets.
Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Micromagnetic Investigation of the Effect of Main-Phase Distribution on the Coercivity of NdNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The grain boundary diffusion (GBD) process is currently the relatively effective method for utilizing heavy rare earth (HRE) elements in NdFeB magnets, especially for magnetic sheets. However, due to a highly uneven microstructure, the recovery of GBD magnets was considered difficult. In this work, our study prioritized short-loop recycling of GBD NdFeB sheet magnets to prepare block magnets. A comparative investigation was conducted between GBD-processed NdFeB magnets and the conventional sintered magnets, with particular emphasis on their recyclability characteristics. Among them, the Tb content of GBD magnets of 0.4 wt.% was significantly lower than sintered magnets of 1.73 wt.%. When two waste magnets were supplemented with the same amount of rare earth, it was found that the coercivity of the block magnets regenerated from GBD sheet magnets was higher. Microstructural analysis revealed that the core-shell grains originally located in the surface layer of GBD magnets were uniformly mixed and diffused with the ordinary particles originally located inside during the regeneration sintering process. The regenerated GBD magnets exhibited a more uniform core-shell microstructure with submicron shells of Tb elements along with reduced areas of RE-rich phase enrichment which facilitated the formation of a continuous and uniform thin-layer grain boundary, thereby enhancing the magnetic isolation effect. Apart from the significance of recycling, these block magnets regenerated from GBD magnets also provides a new approach to solving the challenge of high coercivity and low HRE elements in bulk magnets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.