ReviewNeurology international2025
Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Versus Lumbar Epidural Block for Pain Management After Hip Surgeries with a Focus on Pediatric Patients: A Narrative Review.
Review in Neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing pericapsular nerve group block and fascia iliaca compartment block for intraoperative and postoperative analgesia in hip surgeries in pediatrics: a randomized controlled trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Trial
- Perioperative analgesia with combined Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve blocks in pediatric femoral neck surgery: a two-case report.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pediatric hip surgeries are associated with moderate to high levels of pain, which, in severe cases can lead to opioid prescription and use. There is a growing focus on reducing post-operative pain in these patients to decrease the need for opioids, as well as increase early mobilization for recovery. Conventional methods of pain relief using opioids can have unwanted negative impacts on pediatric patients such as respiratory depression, nausea, confusion, and the concerning possibility for the development of dependence. Likewise, traditional methods of anesthesia, like the lumbar epidural block, can have unwanted systemic side effects, such as hypotension, urinary retention, arrhythmias, and spinal abscesses. These complications can lead to longer hospital stays and delayed recovery. This review analyzes the efficacy of a newer regional anesthesia technique, the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block, in comparison to the lumbar epidural block. This technique utilizes precision-based anesthesia to selectively block the articular branches to the hip joint while avoiding the main trunks of the femoral and obturator nerves. Additionally, with the utilization of high-resolution ultrasound to guide the blocks, providers can increasingly count on proper insertion and predictable anesthetic spread. The result is a motor-sparing blockade that shows promise in allowing earlier mobilization and better functional recovery times after pediatric hip surgeries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.