ReviewNeurology international2025
Deciphering the Structural Biology of GFAP: Connotations of Its Potency in Presaging the Diagnosis for Traumatic Brain Injury and AD.
Review in Neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced nanobiosensors for the detection of neurovascular damage in cerebral infarction: prospects and challenges.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Article
- The complement system in Alzheimer's disease: evaluating biomarker potential in a complex neuroimmune context.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2026Review
- Targeting Peptidylarginine Deiminases in Neurons and Astrocytes in Central Nervous System Injury-Effects of Pan-PAD Inhibitor Cl-Amidine in an Oxygen-Glucose Deprivation Model of Ischaemia (OGD/R) and LPS Stimulation In Vitro.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- The Dynamics of Neuroinflammation in Traumatic Brain Injury: Molecular Markers Useful for Establishing the Post-Traumatic Interval in Forensic Practice.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Alzheimer's disease, accumulation of Aβ and tau aggregates in the limbic and cortical regions of the brain forms the pathological basis for the onset of memory loss and cognitive abnormalities. The neuronal desecration inflicted by these toxic pile-ups will rouse the onset of innate immune defense mechanisms including astrogliosis within the neuronal milieu. A potential ramification of astrogliosis is the overproduction and spillage of GFAP into the brain circulation. Execution of GFAP vital physiological functions rests upon the preservation of its filamentous structure as well as its cytoskeletal interactions. Any anomaly that hampers the structural integrity of GFAP will engender filament disassembly, cytoplasmic aggregation, and decreased solubility with the resultant deleterious consequences. The potency of GFAP as a reliable biomarker in the blood also rests on its ability to navigate the glymphatic excretory pathways and spill into the systemic circulation. Recent reports have suggested GFAP is a dependable marker for auguring subtle disease changes in traumatic brain injury (TBI) and AD. However, pathological anomalies such abnormal structural integrity, cleavage, impaired drainage pathways, and alternative isoforms will lessen its potency and thwarts its ability from becoming a full-fledged and stable biomarker for neurological diseases. Understanding the GFAP biology, including factors that influence its structural integrity and excretory pathways, will be crucial and this review underscores these sections in a succinct manner. Thorough comprehension of GFAP biology is the principal step in unearthing its potential as a powerful marker for auguring disease initiation, and progression in TBI and AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.