ArticleMembranes2025
Investigations on the Particle Fouling and Backwash Efficiency During Microplastic Microfiltration-Particle Size Aspects.
Article in Membranes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The characteristics of polystyrene (PS) microplastic (MP) microfiltration by a cellulose acetate (CA) membrane were investigated within this study. Particle sizes and pore sizes were selected in a comparable range in order to challenge the dead-end microfiltration. Backwashing experiments round up the investigations. Microfiltration characteristics and particle size measurements, as well as a particle fouling analysis by different methods, were applied in the study in order to provide a comprehensive picture of particle deposition and particle fouling structuring. The particle removal efficiency was particle-size-dependent, and especially small particles were further reduced during the proceeding filtration, while the larger particles were already removed within the first minutes of filtration. This observation was attributed to the pore blocking (internal and/or complete) and build-up of the filter cake. The difference in the particle-fouling structure at low and elevated filtration pressure significantly influences the backwashing efficiency. The particle fouling resulting from low-pressure filtration was completely removed due to the backwashing procedure applied, while an increased filtration pressure resulted in a different particle-fouling structure, which negatively influenced the backwashing efficiency. This knowledge of the formation and structure of the MP particle fouling and its removal by backwashing is a prerequisite for further process development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.