Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41002853›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025

CF-PEEK vs. Titanium Dental Implants: Stress Distribution and Fatigue Performance in Variable Bone Qualities.

Nurdan Polat Sağsöz, Fahri Murat, Sema Nur Sevinç Gül, Abdullah Tahir Şensoy, Irfan Kaymaz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nurdan Polat SağsözFaculty of Dentistry, Atatürk University, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey.
Fahri MuratDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Erzurum Technical University, 25050 Erzurum, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9513-7813
Sema Nur Sevinç GülFaculty of Dentistry, Atatürk University, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-0699-917X
Abdullah Tahir ŞensoyFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9371-8307
Irfan KaymazDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Erzurum Technical University, 25050 Erzurum, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9391-7218

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the biomechanical behavior of titanium and carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CF-PEEK) dental implants under varying bone densities and loading conditions using finite element analysis (FEA). A single-tooth mandibular molar implant system was modeled, comprising titanium or CF-PEEK abutment and fixture, and surrounding bone structures with four configurations: (I) fully cortical bone, (II) 2 mm cortical layer with trabecular bone, (III) 1 mm cortical with high-density trabecular bone, and (IV) 1 mm cortical with low-density trabecular bone. Vertical and oblique static loads of 100 N were applied to simulate masticatory forces. FEA results revealed that titanium implants exhibited higher von Mises stress values in the implant and abutment under oblique loading, exceeding 400 MPa, while CF-PEEK components showed reduced stress but significantly higher strain levels. Cortical and trabecular bone surrounding CF-PEEK implants received more uniform stress distribution, potentially minimizing stress shielding effects. However, fatigue life analyses indicated that CF-PEEK abutment and screw components were more susceptible to mechanical failure under oblique loads, particularly in low-density bone models. In conclusion, CF-PEEK implants offer a more physiological load transfer to bone and reduced stress shielding compared to titanium. However, their structural reliability under complex loading, especially in low-quality bone conditions, requires careful consideration. These findings support the potential use of CF-PEEK in select clinical scenarios but highlight the need for further material and design optimization.

Indexed as

bone densityCF-PEEKdental implantsfatigue analysisfinite element analysis (FEA)

Identifiers

PMID41002853
PMCPMC12467904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.