ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
CF-PEEK vs. Titanium Dental Implants: Stress Distribution and Fatigue Performance in Variable Bone Qualities.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Overcoming the Biomechanical Limitations of Titanium-Zirconia Dental Implants: Rationale for a Novel Ti-PEEK-Zr Tri-Layered Concept.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Application-matched point-of-care 3D printing of functionalized polyetheretherketone (PEEK) composites for patient-specific craniomaxillofacial implants.3D printing in medicine · 2026Article
- Biomechanical comparison of three-dimensional titanium and CFR-PEEK plates for mandibular subcondylar fracture fixation: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Quantifying Stress Shielding in Dental Implants: A Comparative Finite Element Study of Titanium, CFR-PEEK, and Ceramic Materials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Impact of laser modification on the contact angle and surface wettability of hydroxyapatite-coated PEEK implant material.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the biomechanical behavior of titanium and carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CF-PEEK) dental implants under varying bone densities and loading conditions using finite element analysis (FEA). A single-tooth mandibular molar implant system was modeled, comprising titanium or CF-PEEK abutment and fixture, and surrounding bone structures with four configurations: (I) fully cortical bone, (II) 2 mm cortical layer with trabecular bone, (III) 1 mm cortical with high-density trabecular bone, and (IV) 1 mm cortical with low-density trabecular bone. Vertical and oblique static loads of 100 N were applied to simulate masticatory forces. FEA results revealed that titanium implants exhibited higher von Mises stress values in the implant and abutment under oblique loading, exceeding 400 MPa, while CF-PEEK components showed reduced stress but significantly higher strain levels. Cortical and trabecular bone surrounding CF-PEEK implants received more uniform stress distribution, potentially minimizing stress shielding effects. However, fatigue life analyses indicated that CF-PEEK abutment and screw components were more susceptible to mechanical failure under oblique loads, particularly in low-density bone models. In conclusion, CF-PEEK implants offer a more physiological load transfer to bone and reduced stress shielding compared to titanium. However, their structural reliability under complex loading, especially in low-quality bone conditions, requires careful consideration. These findings support the potential use of CF-PEEK in select clinical scenarios but highlight the need for further material and design optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.