ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Power Restoration Optimization Strategy for Active Distribution Networks Using Improved Genetic Algorithm.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
During feeder outages in the distribution network, localized power restoration using distribution resources (e.g., PVs) can ensure supply to critical loads and mitigate adverse impacts, especially when main grid support is unavailable. This study presents a power restoration strategy aiming at maximizing the restoration duration of critical loads to ensure their prioritized recovery, thereby significantly improving power system reliability. The methodology begins with load enumeration via breadth-first search (BFS) and utilizes a long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network to predict microgrid generation output. Then, an adaptive multipoint crossover genetic solving algorithm (AMCGA) is proposed, which can dynamically adjust crossover and mutation rates, enabling rapid convergence and requiring fewer parameters, thus optimizing island partitioning to prioritize critical load demands. Experimental results show that AMCGA improves convergence speed by 42.5% over the traditional genetic algorithm, resulting in longer restoration durations. Compared with other strategies that do not prioritize critical load recovery, the proposed strategy has shown superior performance in enhancing critical load restoration, optimizing island partitioning, and reducing recovery fluctuations, thereby confirming the strategy's effectiveness in maximizing restoration and improving stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.