ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Cam-Based Simple Design of Constant-Force Suspension Backpack to Isolate Dynamic Load.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prolonged load carriage with ordinary backpacks (OBs) can cause muscle fatigue and skeletal injuries. Research indicates that suspended backpacks can effectively reduce energy expenditure; however, existing elastic rope-based suspension backpacks struggle to adapt to different speeds, while active suspension backpacks gain significant additional weight due to the incorporated motors and batteries. This paper presents a novel cam-based constant-force suspension backpack (CCSB). The CCSB employs a cam-spring mechanism with near-zero suspension stiffness to minimize the inertial forces generated by load oscillations. A test platform was constructed to evaluate the constant-force performance of the mechanism, showing a maximum error of less than 1.96%. Load-carrying experiments were conducted at different walking speeds. Laboratory test results show that, compared with OBs, the CCSB reduces peak accelerative vertical force by an average of 84.47% and reduces human metabolic costs by 10.58%. Outdoor tests show that the CCSB can reduce transportation consumption by 8.26%. The CCSB's compact structure makes it more suitable for commercialization and demonstrates significant potential for practical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.