Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41002695›Full record

ReviewDentistry journal2025

Breaking Barriers: Evaluating Challenges in Advancing Periodontal Ligament Cell-Derived Organoids.

Luiza de Oliveira Matos, Mariane Beatriz Sordi, Anahid Ahmadi Birjandi, Paul Thomas Sharpe, Ariadne Cristiane Cabral Cruz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dentistry journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luiza de Oliveira MatosCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, Guy's Hospital, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4521-0007
Mariane Beatriz SordiCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, Guy's Hospital, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7873-0765
Anahid Ahmadi BirjandiCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, Guy's Hospital, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9010-633X
Paul Thomas SharpeCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, Guy's Hospital, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Ariadne Cristiane Cabral CruzCentre for Dental Implants Research, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 88040-900, SC, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7306-4708

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this review was to critically evaluate the available literature on the development of periodontal ligament organoids. Articles concerning periodontal ligament organoids were considered eligible. References were selected in a two-phased process. Electronic databases PubMed and Scopus were screened up to June 2024, yielding 1101 studies. After removing duplicates, titles, and abstracts were screened, resulting in 44 articles being included in this review. A detailed analysis of the included articles was organized into four categories: (1) the cell lineages used, including the simultaneous use of two or more cell types, (2) the extracellular matrix composition, (3) the organoid preparation methods, and (4) the characterization techniques employed. The main findings show that collagen combined with biodegradable polymers-such as poly(caprolactone), poly(glycolic acid), and poly(lactic acid)-is the most used material. Periodontal ligament cells and periodontal fibroblasts were the most used cell types, due to their role in extracellular matrix remodeling. The most frequent analyses performed included alkaline phosphatase, extracellular matrix mineralization, and gene expression, providing insights into differentiation and periodontal regeneration. Cementogenic differentiation was the most studied, followed by osteogenic, chondrogenic, adipogenic, and epithelial differentiation. However, challenges remain, including methodological inconsistencies and the need for scaffold optimization. Future research should focus on standardizing protocols, improving biomaterials, and integrating bioprinting techniques to improve clinical translation.

Indexed as

organoidsperiodontal ligament cellsperiodontal regenerationthree-dimensional cell culture

Identifiers

PMID41002695
PMCPMC12469206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.