ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2025
Cannulation Strategies for Aortic Arch Surgery.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transesophageal Echocardiographic Guidance of Transapical Aortic Cannulation for Cardiopulmonary Bypass.CASE (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2026Article
- Aortic Arch and Frozen Elephant Trunk Surgery: Anesthetic Challenges and Strategies for Organ Protection.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aortic arch surgery remains associated with significant mortality and morbidity especially in the setting of acute type A aortic dissection. Adequate cerebral protection is essential, and several methods have been proposed to avoid neurological injury during aortic arch surgery. The most common techniques include selective antegrade perfusion of brachiocephalic arteries or an interval of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. A range of cannulation strategies have been employed safely to provide adequate cerebral protection. Optimal cannulation selection is based on the consideration of air or particulate embolism risk; limitation in operative field visibility; end organ perfusion; and interactions with surgical maneuvers. Overall, no technique has been shown to fully mitigate the risk of neurological injury, rather each has utility in different scenarios. Innominate artery cannulation offers high flows on CPB and avoids additional incisions. Right axillary artery is rarely involved in aortic dissections, versatile for use in redo surgery, and altered blood flow patterns reduce embolic stroke rates. Left axillary artery can be utilized when both right axillary and femoral arteries are involved in a dissection process. Novel bi-axillary approach has additionally shown good results. Future multicenter, randomized trials should focus on establishing the relative benefits and risks of each cannulation approach with the aim of delineating the optimal cannulation strategy for different clinical situations to guide aortic surgeons, particularly in the emergency setting of aortic dissection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.