ArticleJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2025
Prognostic Utility of HEFESTOS Score and Complementary Lung Ultrasound for Heart Failure Decompensation in Primary Care Outpatients: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prognostic value of jugular, pulmonary and inferior vena cava ultrasound in decompensated heart failure in primary care.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) is a major contributor to morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs, particularly among older adults. Effective outpatient risk stratification remains a clinical challenge, especially following hospital discharge or episodes of acute decompensation. Although both lung ultrasound (LUS) and the HEFESTOS score have shown individual prognostic value, their combined use in primary care settings has not been extensively explored. This prospective cohort study included 107 patients with confirmed HF followed at a primary care center in southern Catalonia. At baseline, all patients underwent LUS and HEFESTOS assessment. The primary outcome was HF decompensation, defined as worsening symptoms requiring medical attention, emergency care, hospitalization, or death. Over a mean follow-up of 72 days, 25 patients (23.3%) experienced decompensation. In multivariate analysis, only the HEFESTOS score was independently associated with decompensation. LUS and HEFESTOS showed moderate agreement (Kappa = 0.456), and LUS demonstrated moderate discriminative capacity (AUC = 0.677) with high sensitivity (81.7%) and positive predictive value (81.7%). These findings support the routine use of the HEFESTOS score in primary care and suggest that LUS may serve as a complementary tool, particularly for identifying subclinical pulmonary congestion. Their combined use could enhance outpatient risk stratification and guide individualized follow-up strategies in HF management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.