ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2025
Hybrid PET/CT and PET/MR in Coronary Artery Disease: An Update for Clinicians, with Insights into AI-Guided Integration.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plaque Progression and Rupture in Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: A Review of Current Imaging Modalities.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Spectral computed tomography characterization of coronary atherosclerotic plaque: principles, imaging biomarkers, and clinical significance.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Imaging techniques such as positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MR) have emerged as powerful and versatile tools for the comprehensive assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD). By combining anatomical and functional information in a single examination, these modalities offer complementary insights that significantly enhance diagnostic accuracy and support clinical decision-making. This is particularly relevant in complex clinical scenarios, such as multivessel disease, balanced ischemia, or suspected microvascular dysfunction, where conventional imaging may be inconclusive. This review aims to provide clinicians with an up-to-date summary of the principles, technical considerations, and clinical applications of hybrid PET/CT and PET/MR in CAD. Here, we describe how these techniques can improve the evaluation of myocardial perfusion, coronary plaque characteristics, and ischemic burden. Advantages such as improved sensitivity, spatial resolution, and quantification capabilities are discussed alongside limitations including cost, radiation exposure, availability, and workflow challenges. A dedicated focus is given to the emerging role of artificial intelligence (AI), which is increasingly being integrated to optimize image acquisition, fusion processes, and interpretation. AI has the potential to streamline hybrid imaging and promote a more personalized and efficient management of CAD. Finally, we outline future directions in the field, including novel radiotracers, automated quantitative tools, and the expanding use of hybrid imaging to guide patient selection and therapeutic decisions, particularly in revascularization strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.