Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41002578›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025

Sleep Problems and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients.

Andreas Hinz, Michael Friedrich, Thomas Schulte, Mareike Ernst, Ana N Tibubos, Katja Petrowski, Nadja Dornhöfer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andreas HinzDepartment of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Michael FriedrichDepartment of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0528-1564
Thomas SchulteRehabilitation Clinic Bad Oexen, 32549 Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.
Mareike ErnstDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Psychotherapy, and Psychoanalysis, University of Klagenfurt, 9020 Klagenfurt, Austria.
Ana N TibubosDepartment of Nursing Science, Diagnostics in Healthcare & eHealth, University of Trier, 54286 Trier, Germany.
Katja PetrowskiDepartment of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Nadja DornhöferDepartment of Gynecology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0247-1095

Funding

German Cancer Aid 7011 4423
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSleep problems are frequently observed in breast cancer patients. However, the relationship between sleep quality and overall quality of life (QoL) and the specificity of different sleep-related questionnaires have not yet been adequately studied in breast cancer patients.

methodsThe sample of this cross-sectional study consisted of 533 breast cancer patients, recruited in a German rehabilitation clinic, with a mean age of 52.3 years (SD = 12.5 years). The following three sleep-related questionnaires were used: the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and the Jenkins Sleep Scale (JSS). In addition, we used the QoL instrument EORTC QLQ-C30.

resultsSleep quality was poor in this sample of breast cancer patients. The effect sizes

conclusionAs the burden of sleep problems is high, screening for sleep problems in breast cancer patients is important.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsQuality of LifeSleep Wake DisordersAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSleep QualitySurveys and Questionnairesbreast cancerinsomniaquality of lifesleep problemssleep quality

Identifiers

PMID41002578
PMCPMC12468225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.