ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025
The Rethinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) Program: A Pragmatic Research Strategy to Improve Cancer Care for Patients, Caregivers, and Healthcare Systems.
Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer care has become increasingly complex, expensive, and inaccessible, with patients often exposed to increased treatment-related harms for marginal benefits. Pragmatic clinical trials offer a solution by conducting real-world studies that evaluate dose optimization, toxicity, quality of life, and resource utilization. Pragmatic trials can also address the efficacy-effectiveness gap: the poorer outcomes and greater toxicity observed in everyday practice compared to those reported in many clinical trials. The Rethinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) program was designed to conduct patient-centered practice-changing research by involving patients, their families, and healthcare providers in the design of inclusive, real-world clinical trials. The REaCT process starts with surveys and systematic reviews to identify knowledge gaps and uses this information to design pragmatic clinical trials that address these deficits. Since 2014, the program has conducted 17 patient and 17 healthcare provider surveys with 2298 and 1033 responses, respectively. With these results, the program has performed 22 systematic reviews. These surveys and systematic reviews have resulted in 19 completed and 8 ongoing REaCT clinical trials that have recruited over 5000 patients from across Canada. Here, we present some of the practice-changing research conducted by the REaCT program and address challenges facing the growth of pragmatic research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.